Howrah News Service - Latest news and headlines on Howrah,West Bengal and World: Natwar: PM, Pranab differ on nuke deal Natwar: PM, Pranab differ on nuke deal ================================================================================ NewsByte on 26 May, 2008 03:12:36 By Ramesh Mohan Chaturvedi New Delhi May 26: There are differences in the way Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his external affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee see the much-discussed India-US civilian nuclear deal former foreign minister Natwar Singh has said. "The Prime Minister says the deal is on and they will get it through but when Mr Mukherjee is asked about it there is a big question mark. Mr Mukherjee has even said the deal is not going to pass," Mr Singh said in an interview. When told that it was Mr Mukherjee who is selling the deal to the Left parties on behalf of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance, Mr Singh said: "Much depends on how enthusiastic he himself is about the deal". The India-US civilian nuclear deal has run into rough weather with the Left parties — who lend outside support to the UPA government — opposing it. The main Opposition party Bharatiya Janata Party is also opposed to the deal in its present form. The US government has repeatedly told the Indian government that time may be running out for the deal to materialise as the George Bush presidency enters its last leg ahead of polls. "he UPA government has gone about the deal in the wrong manner. When it knew that Parliament would not approve it, it should not have gone ahead," said Mr Singh, who was external affairs minister in the Manmohan Singh Cabinet till December 2005. He was succeeded by Mr Mukherjee. Mr Singh had to resign when he, and his son Jagat Singh, were named beneficiaries by a UN inquiry committee headed by Paul Volcker in an Iraqi oil scam.The former minister said the draft of the civilian nuclear deal had undergone several drastic changes since he first saw and approved it as external affairs minister on July 18, 2005. — IANS "Manmohan Singh and I saw it during our visit to Washington. I supported it then for two reasons. One, it tacitly recognised India as a nuclear power. And two, it was energy-oriented." Mr Singh said the term energy was later downplayed and non-proliferation was emphasised. "There were no questions about the 123 agreement, the Hyde Act, or the International Atomic Energy Agency inspections then," he said. "The US has shifted the goal post several times," he said, adding: "I don’t see the deal going through". Mr Singh, who was in the Indian Foreign Service (IFS) before joining the Congress, said: "The United States is selling this deal to us in an attempt to pitch us against China. We should not fall for it." (IANS)